Connecting...

This is a quick preview of the lesson. For full access, please Log In or Sign up.
For more information, please see full course syllabus of Linear Algebra
For more information, please see full course syllabus of Linear Algebra
Linear Algebra Rank of a Matrix, Part II
Lecture Description
Continuing our discussion on matrix ranks we’ll explore some ways to use the rank and how to compute it. This is a continuation of the previous video, so if you haven’t watched it we suggest taking the time to do so as the points discussed here won’t make much sense without having seen it. The main point to take away from the rank is the theorem shown in this video where it can be used in combination with the nullity to find n; this is a crucial point to take away from this topic. After this video we’ll look more into vectors.
Bookmark & Share
Embed
Share this knowledge with your friends!
Copy & Paste this embed code into your website’s HTML
Please ensure that your website editor is in text mode when you paste the code.(In Wordpress, the mode button is on the top right corner.)
×
Since this lesson is not free, only the preview will appear on your website.
- - Allow users to view the embedded video in full-size.
Next Lecture
Previous Lecture
1 answer
Sat Aug 8, 2015 10:15 PM
Post by matt kruk on July 19, 2015
hi professor so if a system of equations only has the trivial solution is it still possible to solve it in differential equations. for example variation of parameters relies on having the solutions to the homogeneous system. would you just be forced to use undetermined coefficients to solve the system?
2 answers
Last reply by: Matt C
Thu Apr 4, 2013 7:06 PM
Post by Matt C on April 3, 2013
I am just curious on this question? Is it possible to take a basis of a null space and work all the way back into the rref form? But you are not giving the size of the matrix, just the basis of the null space. I know, I can figure out the number of free variables and the how many columns are in the matrix, but is it possible to figure out how many pivots and rows are in the matrix? I was just bored so I tried to work backwards, but seem to be getting stuck.
1 answer
Wed Apr 3, 2013 12:58 AM
Post by Matt C on April 2, 2013
For the first example part I entered the matrix into my calculator and put it in row reduce echelon form and I did not get what you did. I then went back in the notes (because you used this matrix in the previous episode) and I noticed that you forgot to put a negative in front of the 1 in row 4 column 1 in the 4x5 matrix. So the last row in the 4x5 matrix should be (-1,2,0,4,-3). That seems to work. Let me know if that is correct please.
1 answer
Mon Dec 3, 2012 12:39 AM
Post by Eduardo Voloch on December 2, 2012
There is an error on "b)", 4th row, 5th column, should be -3 and not 3. Excellent video though. Really well explained. Thank you so much!
0 answers
Post by Ken Mullin on January 21, 2012
Very well demonstated and explained.
However, unless row and column manipulations were "drilled" to watchers in earlier videos (I skipped immediately to this section, having some familiarity with the topic), I'm wondering how many may be following the final matrix appearance in RREF.