Connecting...

This is a quick preview of the lesson. For full access, please Log In or Sign up.
For more information, please see full course syllabus of AP Physics 1 & 2
For more information, please see full course syllabus of AP Physics 1 & 2
AP Physics 1 & 2 Collisions
Lecture Description
Like Newton’s laws, momentum has a law of its own stating that momentum will always be conserved in an isolated system (one that’s ‘boxed in’ from the outside world). Collisions occur when two objects hit each other (e.g: car crash). Here, you’ll learn how to solve momentum problems utilizing what we’ve learned before, FBD, among other techniques. This will end our momentum lesson, and next we’ll get into circular and radial motion.
Bookmark & Share
Embed
Share this knowledge with your friends!
Copy & Paste this embed code into your website’s HTML
Please ensure that your website editor is in text mode when you paste the code.(In Wordpress, the mode button is on the top right corner.)
×
Since this lesson is not free, only the preview will appear on your website.
- - Allow users to view the embedded video in full-size.
Next Lecture
Previous Lecture
2 answers
Sat Jul 9, 2016 6:11 AM
Post by Elman Ahmed on July 7, 2016
Professor, i was talking Physics 1 in the summer. I listened to ALL of your lectures from Physics 1. The example no. 2 in this lecture was very helpful! I got something very Similar. As a matter of fact, i got a lot of similar problems from your sample problems. Thank you so much. I did great in that class.
1 answer
Mon Jun 27, 2016 7:58 AM
Post by Peter Ke on June 25, 2016
For example 4, at 15:00 you used the substitution method but I used the elimination method by getting rid of the .113V_8 by subtracting. The answer I got was 2.13 m/s for V_cue. You got 2.14 m/s. Will the AP exam grader accept my 2.13 m/s as my answer or not? Just curious.
.51 = .13V_cue + .113V_8
-(0 = -.109V_cue + .113V_8)
----------------------------
.51 = .239V_cue
V_cue = 2.13 m/s
0 = -.109(2.13) + .113V_8
V_8 = 2.06 m/s
0 answers
Post by Jayden Luis on May 7, 2016
Great!
1 answer
Mon Jan 4, 2016 6:14 AM
Post by Mustafa Lambay on January 3, 2016
Heyo, for example 5: Atomic Collisions, why did you use 1000m as the momentum before the elastic collision for the proton instead of just 1000 m/s?
Thanks amigo.
2 answers
Last reply by: Anh Dang
Fri Jul 24, 2015 2:36 PM
Post by Anh Dang on July 23, 2015
Velocity needs speed and direction, right? So, for example 4, what would be the directions for the cue ball and the eight ball?
2 answers
Tue Jun 16, 2015 7:54 PM
Post by Denise Aguilar on June 16, 2015
hello professor,
I am missing where the 14000 VL came from when you expanded (1000-7Vl)^2 by writing it as 10^6-14000Vl+49VL^2. Please help : )
Thank you
3 answers
Mon Apr 6, 2015 6:55 AM
Post by Anna Ha on April 1, 2015
Hi,
How would you do this question?
1. A frictionless trolley, m1, of mass 2.00kg, moving to the right at 6.00m/s, collide with and sticks to an initially stationary frictionless trolley, m2, of mass 4.00kg.
a) calculate the magnitude and direction of the impulse exerted ON m1 BY m2 during the collision?
Thanks!
3 answers
Wed Nov 5, 2014 8:27 AM
Post by Caleb Martin on November 5, 2014
Hi,
what equation best fits these questions? Problem: "A railroad car of mass 2.53 104 kg is moving with a speed of 4.06 m/s. It collides and couples with three other coupled railroad cars, each of the same mass as the single car and moving in the same direction with an initial speed of 2.03 m/s."
Question:(a) What is the speed of the four cars after the collision?
Question:(b) How much mechanical energy is lost in the collision?
Thanks
1 answer
Sat Oct 11, 2014 8:10 PM
Post by Foaad Zaid on October 11, 2014
So the only purpose of the kinetic energy equation was to give us a second equation to allow us to solve for 2 unknowns? I'm having difficulty understanding why the kinetic energy equations were implemented. Thank you again.
1 answer
Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:47 AM
Post by Foaad Zaid on October 11, 2014
I don't seem to understand why including kinetic energy was necessary? Thank you
1 answer
Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:47 AM
Post by Foaad Zaid on October 11, 2014
For the atomic collision, how come it just wouldn't be possible to use set momentum final = momentum initial?
1 answer
Sat Aug 2, 2014 1:27 PM
Post by Jungle Jones on August 2, 2014
In Ex. 5, how do you know VL can't be zero?
3 answers
Mon Jun 16, 2014 6:17 AM
Post by Pedro Gallegos on June 15, 2014
19:57 19:58 I dont understand how -7VL = 14,000
1 answer
Sun Feb 23, 2014 9:59 AM
Post by rumeh mandible on February 22, 2014
A 1-kg chunk of putty moving at 1 m/s collides with and stick to a 5-lkg bowling bail initially at rest.The bowling ball and putty then move with a momentum of ......
1 answer
Sun Feb 23, 2014 9:58 AM
Post by rumeh mandible on February 22, 2014
when bullets are fired from an airplane in the forward direction, the momentum of the the airplane will be
1 answer
Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:28 AM
Post by Hyun Cho on January 28, 2014
Hey, in example 5, when you are doing the conservation of kinetic energy part, you said 1/2mv^2=1/2mvp^2+1/2mvl^2. but should it be 1/2mvp^2-1/2mvl^2 since the velocity of lithium is opposite the velocity of proton?
2 answers
Last reply by: Hyun Cho
Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:07 PM
Post by Hyun Cho on January 28, 2014
Hey, in example 5, when you are doing the conservation of kinetic energy part, you said 1/2mv^2=1/2mvp^2+1/2mvl^2. but should it be 1/2mvp^2-1/2mvl^2 since the velocity of lithium is opposite the velocity of proton?
2 answers
Last reply by: Gaurav Kumar
Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:51 PM
Post by Gaurav Kumar on August 29, 2013
I know this is related to the previous comment, but I still don't understand one thing. How come for PAx you use cos(40), but for PAy you use sin(-40). Shouldn't they both be -40 because the angle is under the horizontal?
1 answer
Fri May 3, 2013 7:04 AM
Post by Ardeshir Badr on May 1, 2013
At 13:50, why do you use sin(-40) as opposed to sin(40)for Pay column? and you did not use sin(-45), you used sin(45). where is the logic behind knowing whether it is negative or positive sign for the degrees. sin(-40) vs. sin(40). I followed the previous segments on this but still cannot figure it out! thanks!
1 answer
Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:43 PM
Post by Muna Lakhani on April 20, 2013
For example 5, are you using the KE equation where KE= 1/2mv(Squared)?