Connecting...

This is a quick preview of the lesson. For full access, please Log In or Sign up.
For more information, please see full course syllabus of AP Physics 1 & 2
For more information, please see full course syllabus of AP Physics 1 & 2
AP Physics 1 & 2 Kinematic Equations
Lecture Description
Kinematic equation is the backbone of the mechanics course and will be continually referenced throughout the course, so make sure to understand them conceptually and mathematically. It describes how objects move around the physical world and these equations are why people can calculate the distance someone travelled knowing their speed and time. Note that these equations work in 1 dimension at a time, so to work in multiple dimensions we need to have multiple sets of these equations, which would all be connected through time. Next we’ll put these equations to use in multiple 2 dimensional problems.
Bookmark & Share
Embed
Share this knowledge with your friends!
Copy & Paste this embed code into your website’s HTML
Please ensure that your website editor is in text mode when you paste the code.(In Wordpress, the mode button is on the top right corner.)
×
Since this lesson is not free, only the preview will appear on your website.
- - Allow users to view the embedded video in full-size.
Next Lecture
Previous Lecture
2 answers
Mon Feb 3, 2020 6:39 AM
Post by Elijah Zaito on February 2, 2020
For example 7 under Kinematic Equations (falling objects around 27:50 into Kinematics) - I see how you solved for the 45 m, but when trying to do the problem manually, I was getting 60 m.
To clarify, I mean to say that if gravity acceleration is 10 m/s^2 and the brick falls for 3 seconds with no air resistance, wouldn't that mean that the brick was going 10 meters per second for Second 1, then 20 m/s for Second 2, and finally 30 m/s for Second 3 (accelerating at 10 meters per second, each second)?
Adding these up, I got 60 meters traveled in 3 seconds. I know I am missing something here on why they do not match when using the equation or doing it manually. Any help would be appreciated!
1 answer
Tue Sep 18, 2018 5:27 AM
Post by Kevin Wang on September 17, 2018
Hi Dan, are there any extra practice problems for these kinematic equations
Thanks
2 answers
Tue Aug 29, 2017 9:09 AM
Post by Carlins Almonor on August 29, 2017
My teacher often gives questions that consists of a collision type problem. For example, a car is driving at a certain velocity and sees a barrier at some distance away. Given that his reaction time is some amount of seconds and he accelerates at some amount in the opposite direction, would he crash or not crash?
3 answers
Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:14 PM
Post by Woong Ryeol Yoo on March 15, 2017
Referring to the "AP style" problems in the back of the AP Physics 1 Essential 2nd edition, I have a problem with #7 in page 325.
So, I understand that we can use kinematics equation to find the acceleration. But, the answer (0.855) seems to be only valid for one kinematics equation. I used other equations that have velocities by plugging in the velocities I found by doing displacement over time. But, every equation gave me different answers? Why is this? Is there something wrong with the problem?
4 answers
Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:11 PM
Post by Prajwal Jagadish on November 29, 2016
In the high school physics course, the equations the professor gave us were somewhat different. Are these just different forms?
2 answers
Last reply by: Zhe Tian
Sun Sep 6, 2015 1:32 PM
Post by Zhe Tian on September 5, 2015
Ignore my previous Q, would delete it or edit if I could. A better question would be would it matter if I make down negative? On both the astronaut question and example 10 ball thrown down, I made down my negative and ended up with the exact answer except negative. Obviously the negative and positive answers are different, so does that mean down should always be positive or on the AP there would be +/- answers?
1 answer
Sat Sep 5, 2015 7:43 PM
Post by Zhe Tian on September 5, 2015
On the astronaut example, why wouldn't the distance be negative? I thought if an object was falling down, the distance would have to be negative?
1 answer
Fri Aug 28, 2015 6:48 AM
Post by Bilbo Baggins on August 27, 2015
Hello, is there a place where I could find each physics equation with its components explained? For example, this video explained that a variable with a line over it was average. Thanks
1 answer
Tue Jun 2, 2015 7:37 PM
Post by Vinu Gowda on June 2, 2015
In the fall, I am taking Engineering physics, so if I watch your videos?
Does it help for me?
1 answer
Tue May 26, 2015 2:10 PM
Post by Denise Aguilar on May 26, 2015
Hello Professor,
Kind of a silly question, but in part c of example five when changing the kin. eq to solve for a how did the 2 come in for 2 delta x over t squared? I am sure it is a simple algebraic move.
Thanks
2 answers
Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:05 AM
Post by TAHA sakor on November 11, 2014
What do you mean in (delta y)
2 answers
Last reply by: robert moreno
Tue Jul 1, 2014 6:22 PM
Post by robert moreno on June 21, 2014
This is not pertaining to the lecture, but where do I go to find more practice problems?
3 answers
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:36 AM
Post by Hyun Cho on December 18, 2013
i got a question. at 13:10 about the astronaut problem,i initially set the downward direction as negative and i got -1.65m/s2 as the acceleration. on the AP test, will i still get credit for the answer as long as i say " I have set downward as negative" in my answer? and what would i do for the multiple choice? is there some kind of direction convention that i m not aware of? thanks
1 answer
Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:27 AM
Post by Constance Kang on September 14, 2013
Hello for example 5 part C why can't u use average velocity (0.3m/s) over time (0.3 s) to find acceleration?
1 answer
Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:47 AM
Post by Constance Kang on September 11, 2013
Hi, just find something odd when deriving the second kinematic equation. since displacement=vt i plug in v=(v0+at) --> displacement= (v0+at)t=v0t+at^2 instead of (v0+1/2at^2 why is this?
1 answer
Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:38 AM
Post by Larry wang on August 22, 2013
Hello once again! On your slide about "Air Resistance", from the second bullet point we understand that objects fall at the same rate. Does that mean regardless of objects' masses they fall at the same time. What kind of rate we are taking about over here: acceleration/velocity? Thank you!
1 answer
Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:40 AM
Post by Marie Romano on August 16, 2013
Hi Mr. (Professor?) Fullerton,
I have just started going through these to review for my college physics courses to strengthen my physics. This is probably not calculus-based, right? If it isn't, will there ever be a possibility of YOU teaching a calculus based physics lectures? Because that would just make my life happy.
Thank you for being an excellent teacher- I know how powerful and influential a good teacher can be in a student's life.
Sincerely your student,
-Marie
1 answer
Wed May 22, 2013 11:16 AM
Post by Jude Nawlo on May 22, 2013
Hi Mr. Fullerton,
Thank you for your outstanding Physics Lectures. I have one question about determining the final speed of an object in free fall. If an object is actually physically thrown downwards from a given height with a given speed (e.g. 5 m/s), then from what I understand a would equal 9.8 and vi would equal 5, since they are both positive and in the same direction. But would the displacement then be negative in that free fall scenario, if it is travelling downwards? I have been solving problems using a positive value for displacement in the v^2 = vo^2 + 2ax equation and using the concepts from this lecture, and I have been getting them right, but have been confused now that I realize I have not been using a negative value for displacement. Is this reasoning faulty?
1 answer
Thu May 9, 2013 12:54 PM
Post by Nawaphan Jedjomnongkit on May 9, 2013
In example 10 , Do we need to check that in 0.7 second will the ball touch the ground first because it has information about the height that we throw the ball. Lets say if the time more than 0.7 and the ball actually bounce up then v cannot find from that formula right?
1 answer
Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:14 AM
Post by Ranier Camarines on March 26, 2013
awesome!!