
This is a quick preview of the lesson. For full access, please Log In or Sign up.
For more information, please see full course syllabus of AP Physics 1 & 2
For more information, please see full course syllabus of AP Physics 1 & 2
AP Physics 1 & 2 Newton's 2nd Law of Motion
Lecture Description
Newton’s second law basically states that a force can be calculated by the product of a mass and its acceleration. Since we know acceleration is the rate of change in velocity, it stands to reason that when we’re not moving we’re not exerting a force, right? Actually, one force that always is exerted on you is the gravitational force (gravity), which essentially causes you to always accelerate in the y-direction. Remember this fact when you think of a nonmoving object as one that’s not under acceleration. Thankfully because of Newton’s 3rd law, which we’ll learn about next, we aren’t falling through the Earth.
Bookmark & Share
Embed
Share this knowledge with your friends!
Copy & Paste this embed code into your website’s HTML
Please ensure that your website editor is in text mode when you paste the code.(In Wordpress, the mode button is on the top right corner.)
×
Since this lesson is not free, only the preview will appear on your website.
- - Allow users to view the embedded video in full-size.
Next Lecture
Previous Lecture
1 answer
Wed Mar 18, 2020 4:35 PM
Post by Katherine Bai on March 18, 2020
Can a suspended object ever have a normal force?
1 answer
Fri Nov 16, 2018 7:39 PM
Post by Abdihakim Ibrahim on November 16, 2018
In example 7 why isn't your X lined up with the bank & does that matter because of mg equaling FN?
1 answer
Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:24 PM
Post by Sahitya Senapathy on December 17, 2017
For example 15, why do we only take into account the horizontal acceleration? Wouldn't the net force be 100cos30 + 100sin30 -- and then we plug this into F=MA? Why did you only use 100cos30 to find the acceleration?
1 answer
Tue Oct 24, 2017 9:18 AM
Post by Ratnasiri Gunawardena on October 24, 2017
is there something wrong with the vedio that freeze and go back to beginning ?
1 answer
Thu Jun 23, 2016 10:20 AM
Post by Peter Ke on June 22, 2016
I really don't understand example #14. Would you mind explaining in detail why choice 1,2, and 4 are not the answer. I do however understand why choice 3 is the correct answer.
0 answers
Post by Saadman Elman on June 19, 2016
Your lecture is very effective. It helped me a lot. Thanks.
1 answer
Sun Sep 27, 2015 3:56 PM
Post by Bilbo Baggins on September 27, 2015
I looked up net force vs average force and they were different. Why is the answer to example nine the net force?
2 answers
Last reply by: Jim Tang
Fri Jul 24, 2015 7:35 PM
Post by Jim Tang on July 24, 2015
In Example #14, how does 4N produce equilibrium with 3N and 4N?
1 answer
Tue May 26, 2015 6:09 AM
Post by Ryan Rad on May 25, 2015
Hi quick question, at 12:00 how did u figure out which is your angle theta?? Im so confused, you mentioned by geometry we know, but could you elaborate please?? T
Thank you, oh and btw ur lectures are awesome! :)
1 answer
Tue May 5, 2015 7:23 PM
Post by Mutong Zhou on May 5, 2015
For example 4, why the answer choice D is not one of the answer?
1 answer
Fri Nov 7, 2014 6:20 PM
Post by mohammad mostafa on November 7, 2014
hi i have a question about example 10, is not the direction to the left so it should be negative,as the force of f1=12n > than f2
3 answers
Wed Feb 3, 2016 6:27 AM
Post by Caleb Martin on October 2, 2014
Hi,
I'm trying to firgure out what part of Newtons Second law applies to in this problem: "A force F with arrow applied to an object of mass m1 produces an acceleration of 3.60 m/s2. The same force applied to a second object of mass m2 produces an acceleration of 2.00 m/s2.
(a) What is the value of the ratio m1/m2?
ANS.:
(b) If m1 and m2 are combined into one object, find its acceleration under the action of the force F with arrow.
ANS.: m/s2
2 answers
Last reply by: Him Tam
Sun Jul 20, 2014 11:58 AM
Post by Him Tam on July 19, 2014
In the examples with the boxes on an incline, why is there still a normal force? Does air resistance still matter even if the object is not in the air?
1 answer
Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:37 PM
Post by sara bacellar on March 24, 2014
Hi, great lecture.However, I still need you help, I can't explain to myself how you did cancel out a 4 N and a 3 N and another 4N. How did you work this out? Thank you so much :)
1 answer
Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:17 PM
Post by John Parker on March 16, 2014
Thank you so much for these extremely helpful videos! One question: In example 11, does the object accelerate downward through the surface? I was surprised that the acceleration wasn't zero; I expected the normal force to increase along with the added 10 newtons South.
1 answer
Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:10 AM
Post by UMAIR TARIQ on March 14, 2014
Thank you, you are awesome. I had a quick question why were the x component in the banked car example Normal sin theta and in example 15 it is cos.
thank you again!!!
1 answer
Thu Jan 9, 2014 5:53 AM
Post by Hyun Cho on January 9, 2014
Hey i have another question about the last example. Sin30x49+sin60x85=mg. but since the tensions of the rope are facing up, they are positive (if up is positive and down is negative). Well then since the gravitational acceleration is going downward, shouldnt the g in mg be negative and therefore the m is negative as well?? I know its impossible to have negative mass, but its what i get
1 answer
Thu Jan 9, 2014 5:52 AM
Post by Hyun Cho on January 9, 2014
hi that was a great lecture but i dont get one thing. in example14, im fully aware why 9n cannot be equaled. but at the same time, i cant see how 4 is equaled either. could you show me how 4n can result?
1 answer
Thu Jan 9, 2014 5:50 AM
Post by Hyun Cho on January 8, 2014
hi i have a question. in example 6, you used the slanted plane as the x axis so that the normal force in perpendicular to the x axis, but in example, you just randomly made a x and y axis and drew the normal force and mg as they are.. how do i know what will be the x and y axis?
1 answer
Sat Nov 16, 2013 9:17 PM
Post by Constantin Ficiu on November 16, 2013
Great Lecture. I grasp the concepts of Forces and Newton's Laws in here, on the lectures taught by you, professor than the one's taught in my university.
Thank you.
1 answer
Fri Aug 23, 2013 12:17 PM
Post by Larry wang on August 23, 2013
Great lecture. Now I am going over this topic, and on example 14, however, I can't explain to myself on how you have derived 1N force could cancel out two concurrent forces (3N and 4N). Are those two concurrent forces somehow acting at an angle. If so what's the example. How do you work this out? Thank you very much
1 answer
Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:32 PM
Post by KyungYeop Kim on July 18, 2013
I have a question. If something is moving at a constant speed(no acceleration), then does it mean it doesn't have Force? but surely some force must be acting on it to move. I'm confused; when calculating force, what do the velocity and acceleration have to do with force(F)? (I know F=mxa, but it doesn't help)
1 answer
Sat Jun 1, 2013 3:18 PM
Post by Jude Nawlo on June 1, 2013
In example 7, how do you determine where angle theta should be with reference to the initial diagram? I can't tell where to put the angle?
1 answer
Wed May 22, 2013 6:01 AM
Post by kevin vaughn on May 21, 2013
for example 7 t= 12:17, why is the opposite of theta Fnsintheta. shouldn't that be the y component?
7 answers
Last reply by: Arshin Jain
Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:37 AM
Post by Nawaphan Jedjomnongkit on May 10, 2013
in ex14 how about choice 4N? How it can produce equilibrium with 3 and 4N ? Thank you
1 answer
Sat Apr 27, 2013 5:46 PM
Post by Edward Xavier on April 27, 2013
great lecture :D
1 answer
Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:42 AM
Post by John Smith on March 24, 2013
If Newton's first law really is a special case of the second then why are we taught the "three laws of motion" in school? Is it for historical reasons?