Connecting...

This is a quick preview of the lesson. For full access, please Log In or Sign up.
For more information, please see full course syllabus of AP Physics 1 & 2
For more information, please see full course syllabus of AP Physics 1 & 2
AP Physics 1 & 2 Newton's 1st Law of Motion
Lecture Description
Newton’s first law (also called the law of inertia) states that all objects in motion remain in moving unless acted on by another force, and same for nonmoving objects. Along with the next two laws you will learn about, this is something that will always be true in the physical world. This law in particular is the reason why a car coasting down a road will eventually stop if the accelerator isn’t pressed (the force acting on it is called the frictional force). Next, we’ll cover Newton’s other 2 laws, which involve forces.
Bookmark & Share
Embed
Share this knowledge with your friends!
Copy & Paste this embed code into your website’s HTML
Please ensure that your website editor is in text mode when you paste the code.(In Wordpress, the mode button is on the top right corner.)
×
Since this lesson is not free, only the preview will appear on your website.
- - Allow users to view the embedded video in full-size.
Next Lecture
Previous Lecture
1 answer
Wed Oct 25, 2017 5:48 AM
Post by Carlins Almonor on October 24, 2017
The following question asks, "If, for every force there is an equal and opposite reaction force, then all forces in nature come in equal and opposite pairs, and are therefore balanced. Thus, since there can never be such a thing as an unbalanced force, how can any object ever accelerate?" Find the fault in this misconception.
I understand that the student's logic does not make sense, but I can't find a way to disprove why forces does not come in equal and opposite pairs.
2 answers
Fri Jul 24, 2015 6:56 AM
Post by Jim Tang on July 24, 2015
In the examples, we were only allowed to cross out inertia for mass bc they are directly proportional right? In all other cases, we would have to conceptualize inertia as an object's tendency to resist change in velocity...which would be pretty hard? Or is this method of mass = inertia always work?
1 answer
Fri Jul 24, 2015 6:52 AM
Post by Jim Tang on July 24, 2015
Hey Dan!
What's the difference between static and translational equilibrium?
1 answer
Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:17 AM
Post by MOGIN Daniloff on November 28, 2014
Hi,
What if an object is acted upon by 3 different forces which do not cancel one another out? For example an object is acted upon by a net force of 2N to the north, 3N to the east, and 4N to the south west. What would be the net force in this case, and how would you calculate it?
Thanks.
1 answer
Wed Oct 30, 2013 8:44 AM
Post by Andrei Afilipoaei on October 30, 2013
Dear Mr. Fullerton,
In the lesson about Newton's first law, you stated that an object thrown into space will keep flying away for eternity if it doesn't hit anything.
However, a space ship has many stage rockets. I know that only the first one is needed to escape Earth's gravity. In space, it will never slow down. Then why do the space ships need all the other rockets, if it will never change is speed?
Thank you very much,
Andrei
4 answers
Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:50 AM
Post by Gaurav Kumar on July 13, 2013
Thanks for the great lectures! One question though, what is the difference between static equilibrium, dynamic equilibrium, and translational equilibrium?