
For more information, please see full course syllabus of AP Physics C: Electricity & Magnetism
AP Physics C: Electricity & Magnetism Electric Fields
Electric fields are a way to think about how particles interact with each other, and are thought of propagating out from protons and into electrons. With this topic, you’ll not only learn the physics of electric fields, but also applicable modelling techniques. The electric field that one point in space ‘feels’ due to one or more particles utilizes the property of superposition in that the sum of the electric field(s) produced by each particle in a relative frame of reference is the total electric field felt at that point. When dealing with charged objects, you can use their charge density to find their total charge. The key to solving any vector-related charged object problem is to break up the object into small pieces and integrate, draw a diagram of the problem, and use superposition to simplify your math.
Share this knowledge with your friends!
Copy & Paste this embed code into your website’s HTML
Please ensure that your website editor is in text mode when you paste the code.(In Wordpress, the mode button is on the top right corner.)
- - Allow users to view the embedded video in full-size.
1 answer
Mon Oct 25, 2021 5:52 AM
Post by lyqdot on October 23, 2021
for example 8, would it be correct just to say as d approaches infinite (infinitely long) then the electric field is just 0. since its some constant divided by d^2. THanks!
1 answer
Fri Feb 9, 2018 8:15 AM
Post by Apstudy Apstudy on February 9, 2018
Hello sir, I am wondering how you get (change in Q=Q divided by L) in example 7? What is the meaning under this equation and how did you get that? Are you saying that delta Q is the charge per unit rod length? If so, why would you need the Dy?
1 answer
Sat Jan 6, 2018 8:06 AM
Post by Zachary Saba on January 5, 2018
Hello, in example 6 i was wondering how you calculated the Rdtheta length?
Thanks
3 answers
Wed Sep 6, 2017 9:56 AM
Post by Saad Saeed on September 2, 2017
Hi Mr. F, I have questions about example 3 that I am a bit confused about. I am not sure where E_tot = K/r^2 - K(2)/(11-r^2) the minus came from. does the total sum have to do with direction? or were they equal to each other?
Also, the answer r=4.56 where x= -1.44m but what about when we use the other side of x (11-r) and substituted r=4.56 but will not get us -1.44m. Could you please help me understand this?
1 answer
Fri Jul 28, 2017 7:34 AM
Post by Eyob Astatkachew on July 24, 2017
I cant pause or fast forward or Rewind... what is wrong?
1 answer
Mon Mar 13, 2017 6:18 AM
Post by Mark Sim on March 13, 2017
I find example V11 very difficult to understand. Can you teach me how to do?
1 answer
Mon Mar 13, 2017 6:16 AM
Post by Mark Sim on March 13, 2017
Dear Prof,
I have a question for you from my physics workbook.
Which of the following provides evidence for the quantization of charge?
(a) Electron diffraction experiments
(b)Millikan'oil drop experiment
(c) Photoelectric effect experiments
(d) The deflection of electron beams by electric and magnetic fields
2 answers
Thu Mar 2, 2017 6:50 AM
Post by Harsh Ranawat on March 2, 2017
Sir,
why L/2 and -L/2? Is it because we are considering the point "p" at a distance d from the midpoint of "l"?
1 answer
Sun Sep 18, 2016 7:09 AM
Post by Mohsin Alibrahim on September 17, 2016
Hello Mr F,
For example 7, are we assuming that the rod is positively charged ?
1 answer
Mon Oct 12, 2015 1:10 PM
Post by QAIS ATTARWALA on October 10, 2015
Hi professor, I don't understand why for example six you used sin theta instead of cos theta. Can you clarify?
1 answer
Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:35 PM
Post by Micheal Bingham on August 14, 2015
Hello Mr. Fullerton, if I place a positive charge and a negative charge at the end of a spring and a problem asks me to calculate the initial attracting force, do I have to take in account hooke's law? It says the spring was uncompressed.
3 answers
Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:53 AM
Post by Mohsin Alibrahim on June 6, 2015
Hello Mr F.
For example 5, what if the charge of P was negative ?
Thanks for the wonderful lecture, I'm watching it for the second time and things starts to clearer than before.
1 answer
Tue Jun 2, 2015 7:22 PM
Post by Mohsin Alibrahim on June 2, 2015
Hello Mr F
Would you please elaborate on why symmetry cancel out charges in the x and y directions not in the z ?
1 answer
Sat May 30, 2015 6:26 PM
Post by Mohsin Alibrahim on May 30, 2015
Hello Professor Fullerton,
I understand from the notes that the electric filed point away from the positive charges toward negative, so why in ex III there are electric filed in both left and right ?
1 answer
Sat May 30, 2015 6:24 PM
Post by Mohsin Alibrahim on May 30, 2015
Hello Professor Fullerton,
Why is q positive in ex1 ? Should it negative since we're dealing with an electron not a proton ?
1 answer
Wed May 13, 2015 6:14 AM
Post by Arjun Srivatsa on May 12, 2015
How often have you seen them ask for an integral derivation for electric field on an FRQ? I was wondering how well I needed to know this
2 answers
Tue Apr 28, 2015 5:59 AM
Post by Arshin Jain on April 28, 2015
Hello Professor Fullerton,
Thanks for the fundamentally overwhelming yet helpful lecture!
~ John
===============================================================
Note: I resolved my concern while completing the last sentence of my question. I am leaving the question (and answer) for others, should a similar concern arise.
During example X (i.e. @ 71:00), I am unable to understand, on the second line, the reason for (-2) in the numerator. Could you please explain?
My approach led me to replacing the numerator prior to integration with du = 2rdr, which leaves the integral (after u-substitution) to u^(-3/2).
Ah, I notice that during integral, 1/(-1/2) is the multiplying factor for the power rule.
It seems that I was a bit rusty on my Integration. The concern has been alleviated, Thanks regardless.
1 answer
Last reply by: Thadeus McNamara
Tue Mar 3, 2015 9:16 PM
Post by Thadeus McNamara on March 3, 2015
@ around 51:30, how does rad((L/2)^2+d^2) simplify down to (L/2)?
1 answer
Last reply by: Jingwei Xie
Fri Jan 9, 2015 6:50 PM
Post by Professor Dan Fullerton on January 9, 2015
Hi Jingwei. In example 6 you are correct, the electric field is exerted from all directions, but by observation we can see that all the horizontal components are going to cancel out at point C. The only thing we'll have to worry about are the vertical components. So, we only look at the y-component of the electric field (which is the entire electric field multiplied by sin(theta) in this problem.
0 answers
Post by Jingwei Xie on January 9, 2015
Hello Mr. Fullerton,
In example 6, I don't really understand why the sine was multiplied. What do you mean by vertical here? Do you mean the electric field above point C? But isn't the field strength exerted from all directions?
Thank you!