Connecting...

This is a quick preview of the lesson. For full access, please Log In or Sign up.
For more information, please see full course syllabus of AP Physics C: Electricity & Magnetism
For more information, please see full course syllabus of AP Physics C: Electricity & Magnetism
AP Physics C: Electricity & Magnetism Electric Potential & Electric Potential Energy
Lecture Description
The electric potential difference between two charges is measured in volts (how much energy [in electronvolts] per coulomb), and is the work required to separate the two charges against their attraction. To get further and further away from a charge you must exert more electric energy, which is converted into electric potential energy (much like kinetic/potential gravitational energies). Points that have the same electric potentials can be connected and called equipotential lines. After you’re comfortable with equipotential line characteristics, you can move on to more electric potential topics.
Bookmark & Share
Embed
Share this knowledge with your friends!
Copy & Paste this embed code into your website’s HTML
Please ensure that your website editor is in text mode when you paste the code.(In Wordpress, the mode button is on the top right corner.)
×
Since this lesson is not free, only the preview will appear on your website.
- - Allow users to view the embedded video in full-size.
Next Lecture
Previous Lecture
1 answer
Mon Jun 25, 2018 6:27 AM
Post by Laura Darrow on June 24, 2018
Hello Mr. Fullerton,
Can you please tell me what's wrong with my calculation regarding the electric potential in Example IV - thank you.
V=(k*q)/r
V=9*10^9*-2/3
V=-6*10^9V
1 answer
Tue Feb 27, 2018 8:37 AM
Post by Kevin Fleming on February 27, 2018
Professor Fullerton,
Sorry to bother you again. In part a of the 2013 Frq, shouldn't the Q(Enclosed) be just equal to zero. There are no charges inside the gaussian surface that we are using, right?
3 answers
Fri Feb 23, 2018 6:50 AM
Post by Kevin Fleming on February 22, 2018
Proffesor Fullerton,
Since W = -U (Or potential energy), and W = QV, wouldn't electrical potential energy be U = -QV, not just QV? Thanks.
1 answer
Fri Apr 8, 2016 6:12 AM
Post by Ayberk Aydin on April 7, 2016
For example 8, isn't the electric field directed opposite the displacement? So there should be a negative multiplier? And isn't the charge of the electron at the end negative also? Or did you just realize those two negative would cancel out at the end?
1 answer
Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:20 AM
Post by Shehryar Khursheed on January 17, 2016
Hello Mr. Fullerton, I have a question about the 2003 FRQ, part e.
You used an integral to find the charge enclosed within the gaussian region. When I attempted this problem on my own, I did not use an integral. This is what I did:
1) q=(rho)V
2) Because we are interested in a specific "r", we can just plug in the values for an arbitrary "r" within the spherical cloud.
3) A specific region enclosed will have a volume of (4/3)(pi)r^3, therefore...
4)Qenc= (rho not)(1-(r/R))*((4/3)(pi)r^3)
5)I plugged this into Gauss's Law and ended up with a similar answer, except I did not have a 3/4 in the fraction of r/R
I was wondering, why didn't this approach work. Even if the charge density isn't uniform, I can still plug in the function as long as I have the same function of the volume, can't I? I hope you understand what I'm trying to ask because I'm not sure if I can explain my problem best in writing. Thanks!
1 answer
Sun Apr 5, 2015 6:42 AM
Post by Luvivia Chang on April 4, 2015
hello Professor Dan Fullerton,
why is Electric force F=-du/dl insiead of du/dl?
why is the "-" there ?
1 answer
Sun Mar 29, 2015 9:39 AM
Post by holly song on March 28, 2015
why I keep getting network error message and couldn't watch your lessons? Thanks!