Connecting...

This is a quick preview of the lesson. For full access, please Log In or Sign up.
For more information, please see full course syllabus of Trigonometry
For more information, please see full course syllabus of Trigonometry
Trigonometry Identity Tan(squared)x+1=Sec(squared)x
Lecture Description
This identity is a companion identity to the Pythagorean one, and involves tangent and secant. There is also a very similar one, which involves cotangent and cosecant. There's a trick on how to remember these identities, which is shown in the lecture. In the examples, you'll learn how to derive these ones from the Pythagorean identity. Both these new identities can be proved using the Pythagorean identity. This lecture also covers the examples on how to find the secant if you are given the tangent, and how to find the tangent if you are given the secant.
Bookmark & Share
Embed
Share this knowledge with your friends!
Copy & Paste this embed code into your website’s HTML
Please ensure that your website editor is in text mode when you paste the code.(In Wordpress, the mode button is on the top right corner.)
×
Since this lesson is not free, only the preview will appear on your website.
- - Allow users to view the embedded video in full-size.
Next Lecture
Previous Lecture
1 answer
Thu Mar 27, 2014 5:00 PM
Post by Tami Cummins on March 22, 2014
in example 3 at 12:46 how is 1/cos + 1 = 1 + cos?
2 answers
Mon Oct 21, 2013 10:42 PM
Post by Heinz Krug on October 21, 2013
Example III can be used to show the application of the identity tan^2(θ)+1 = sec^2(θ), but it also shows that sometimes there are simpler solutions, like e.g. this one:
LHS = (cscθ-cotθ)/(secθ-1) = (1/sinθ-cosθ/sinθ)/(1/cosθ-1) =
= ((1-cosθ)/sinθ)/((1-cosθ)/cosθ) = (1/sinθ)/(1/cosθ) =
= cosθ/sinθ = cotθ = RHS;
1 answer
Sat Jun 8, 2013 6:01 PM
Post by William Davis on June 6, 2013
You are by far the best lecturer this site has. You actually care and put forth effort unlike a lot of profs on this site. I wish you taught the Cal I section.
1 answer
Sun May 12, 2013 5:40 PM
Post by William Davis on December 28, 2011
In example III he's using strategies I ever knew you could do, which i believe makes solving complex identities treacherous. You should be able to still solve it without looking for shortcuts. but when I try, I am unable to. It's very frustrating.
1 answer
Sun May 12, 2013 5:33 PM
Post by Jonathan Taylor on October 26, 2011
Ex.3 IS JUST CONFUSING IS THERE A SIMPLER FORM
1 answer
Sun May 12, 2013 5:30 PM
Post by Hero Miles on May 16, 2011
I converted example III into sines and cosines first. It was much easier.